TRAVEL PHOTOGRAPHY
Photography is a favorite hobby of countless people.
Now with inexpensive digital cameras and cell phones and other devices
that capture images, it seems everyone has a camera of some sort. Digital
cameras make taking photographs very inexpensive compared to film cameras.
Because of the cost of a roll of film, the limited numbers of photos that
could be taken on a roll and the expense of having the film developed, people
were more cautious about how many pictures they took.
For a small amount of money, we can purchase cards for our camera that
can take a thousand pictures. We can
take ten pictures of the same subject and immediately discard nine that we
don’t like or even all of them and start over.
It always amuses me to watch a group of tourist alight from a bus with
digital camera in hand and immediately start taking pictures, not even sure of
what they are viewing. We allowed
photography at the Washington Cathedral. Often
I would just look in amazement as fifty students walked through the door and
before they even had a chance to see what was in front of them start shooting.
MY LOVE OF PHOTOGRAPHY
Photography and woodworking have always been important hobbies of mine.
Since my web page is mostly memoirs of our Cathedral Quest, I have
decided to share with you other memories and experiences.
On the home page, I relate the experience of my first visit to the Washington
Cathedral on a whirlwind excursion with my Great Uncle Oley.
Uncle Oley was a great man who had a profound influence on my life.
Both of my grandfathers died before I was born.
Uncle Oley was my mother’s uncle on her father’s side.
A LITTLE FAMILY HISTORY
My great grandparents emigrated
from Wales in 1860. They had four
sons and two daughters. One of the
sons, Will, was my mother’s father. My
great grandfather, Evan J. Davies, had a very strange will (I have a copy) which
stipulated that if any of the children married they would receive $1000 (that
was in 1917 – equivalent of over $16,000 today) and would be cut out of his
will. My grandfather and one other
son were the only two who married. The
other son, Ben, did not have any children. My
mother was the only child of Will who became a widower when mother was a year
old. So when my grandmother died, my
mother was raised by her grandparents, her father, two bachelor uncles and two
old maid aunt all living in the same house – a rather large house in
Huntington, West Virginia. She had many interesting stories to tell about her
upbringing. The family picture on the right was taken in 1892 when Uncle Oley
was five years old (standing on right). When I was born the only persons still living were Uncle Oley and
the two aunts. Our family’s Sunday
tradition was either they came to our house in Ashland, Kentucky – 17 miles
away or we went there. So
after this rather lengthy memoir, you can see how Uncle Oley was so important to
me. Uncle Oley was born in 1887 and died in 1980 at the age of 93. When I was in
college at Marshall University, which was four blocks from their home, I lived
with Uncle Oley and the remaining aunt,“ Aunt Dee”.
I have many stories to tell about those four years.
Uncle Oley was an avid photographer.
He never went anywhere without his camera.
The year that I was born he bought a Kodak Bantam camera.
The ad to the left is from a May 1938 National Geographic which someone
gave me several years ago as a birthday present.
The original price was $115 reduced to $87.50.
This was a very expensive camera for its day.
On today’s market that camera, before being reduced, would cost
$1,733.04 or $1,318.61 on sale. I
have this camera on my bookshelf along with several of my old cameras.
Uncle Oley’s camera was rather advanced for its time.
It had a split image built in range finder, with speed settings up to
1/500th and diaphragm opening to f.2.0.
It was necessary to use a light meter to determine the settings.
There was a large bulky flash attachment which used two different size
flash bulbs. Many good pictures were
missed as he struggled to set the camera, or take out and replace used flash
bulbs.
Color slides were new, and Uncle Oley took them by the truck load.
I have hundreds of slides as well as black and white photographs, mostly
of the family, now in my possession. Every
year Huntington hosted the State Band Festival.
It was a regular ritual to pack up and get a chosen site on the parade
route. Every band seemed to
have more colorful dress than the previous.
Oley was always out in front with his camera.
Hence there were boxes and boxes of slides of unidentifiable bands from
somewhere in West Virginia.
PHOTOGRAPHY HAS CHANGED IN THE LAST
50 YEARS!
When I was twelve, Uncle Oley gave me a Kodak Duoflex camera for Christmas.
It was a reflex camera, box shaped with a top viewer that you looked down
into to see the image. It took a
film that produced 2 x2 negatives. He also gave me a darkroom set (he never had
a dark room). I set up dark room in
our basement. As I developed
from a twelve year old to a teenager, I also developed hundreds of pictures.
I must have pretty good as I still have them in albums and they haven’t
faded. I had a little business of
taking family pictures of our friends and neighbors and printing them with a
Christmas mask so they could send them as family Christmas cards.
By the time I was a junior in high school, I was a serious
photographer. I became the official
photographer for the high school annual. My
equipment, furnished by the school, at the time was top of the line. I had a 4 x
5 Speed Graphic camera – the old press camera.
The 4 x 5 film was loaded
into a two sided plate. This slipped
into the back of the camera. A slide
was pulled out so a picture could be taken, then you put the slide back in
with the black side on the outside before you removed the plate and turned it
over and took another picture. Sometimes I would forget
which side had been used and come up with an interesting double exposure. The
flash attachment was almost as large as the camera and flash bulbs were size of
a standard light bulb. It
wasn’t long before the strobe light was developed to replace the old flash and
the school bought one for me. The
trouble was that the battery that you wore over your shoulder weighed a
“ton”. One of my
assignments was to cover all of the high school foot ball games.
So armed with about five plates (they were also heavy), this huge camera
and the strobe light with the battery slung over my shoulder, I raced up and
down the foot ball field trying to capture the 10 most important plays as that
was all the film I could carry. By
the end of the game I felt as tired as those who had actually played!
I also had a great darkroom at school- I had the only key to it. It
was a great place to hide. It was
very well equipped with a huge enlarger that accomodated the 4 x 5 film.
I had a note from the annual sponsor asking that I be excused from class
to take pictures. I used it
frequently in R.O.T.C. when we were going to do something strenuous. The
officers never kept the note so I got a lot of mileage out of it.
My interest in photography continued in my adult life and my camera became
more and more advanced as technology improved. I had a darkroom in every house
that I lived in. I was also able to make colored prints from slides using a
process call Cibachrome. I looked
Cibachrome up on the web page and it is still used and is presently called
Ilfochrome. The process made
beautiful 8x10 enlargements. I have
a number of pictures framed and they are still beautiful.
I used photography in my church
ministry. I did a number of slide
tape shows. This was before
computers and programs such as Power Point.
I used 35mm slides, two Carousel slide projectors, a device known as a
dissolve control which made the photos fade into each other on the screen plus a
large reel to reel tape recorder that carried music and narration on one stereo
track and an inaudible beep on the other track that activated the dissolve
control. I had a very popular slide
tape show called “Creation”. I
narrated on the tape, along with music, the Creation Story from
Genesis, as I showed nature
slides illustrating the different days of creation.
I was asked to present this to many organizations. I
put together a number of others shows illustrating the history of the parish and
the activities of the year. I almost
needed a moving van to carry all of the equipment. How different it is now with
the use of digital camera and Power Point software!
Now as I teach my church architecture classes, I put all of my slides and
illustrations on Power Point. How
much better this is than the old slide tape programs. All you need now is a
laptop computer and a projector. I
have been fortunate that the colleges have provided this equipment.
So now I carry a finger drive and an extra CD.
So you can see that I am a serious photographer who goes back to the “old
days” of photography. At this
point I want to stop reminiscing and give a few practical suggestions about
taking “church” pictures.
·
Camera type
I don’t think there are too many people who still use film cameras except
for some professional photographers. I
bought my first digital in 2003 before going to England.
One of the main reasons was that people were having their films ruined by
airport security x-rays. Those who
still use film now carry their film in a special container. Traveling
with a digital camera is much safer, the x-ray does not damage image cards. I, also
find a small digital camera much easier to carry around.
You also look less like a tourist. My present camera has many features
that allow me to take photos in a variety of situations and still be compact.
My most recent camera is a Canon Power Shot SD 950 IS.
It is wonderful. I wear it in a pouch on my belt, and when I go out with
my camera, which is always, I have two extra batteries and an extra card with
me. I take four batteries on the
trip and charge the used batteries every night.
There is nothing worse than having something that you wish to capture and
your battery dies and you don’t have spare.
This happened to several people on our last trip.
·
Camera Settings
Many digital cameras have adjustable resolution and compression settings.
My camera’s resolution setting range is from 2592 x 1944 to 4000 x 3000
pixels. It also has three
compression settings. If I set it to
the highest resolution and highest compression I will only be able to take 188
photos on a 1GB card compared to using the lowest settings which will allow 3258
images. Of course the highest
resolution produces the best photograph, but unless you are making big
enlargements the difference between the higher and one a little lower are not
very noticeable. The difficulty is that the higher setting , the more memory you
use on your computer and the download is slower when emailing or placing them on
a web site. I tend to use 3264 x
2448 at normal compression, so if my pictures download slowly I apologize, but
when I took them I wasn’t intending the put them on a web site.
High resolutions photos also use more ink when printing.
One of the great disappointments of our Cathedral Quest is the number of
churches that will not allow any interior photography. On one hand I agree with
the policy because flash or even the sound of a shutter without flash (some
camera allow you to turn off the shutter sound) is disturbing to people who are
in the church for the purpose of meditation and worship.
In my ministry I would never allow pictures to be taken during a wedding
– not even by the professional photographer hired by the bride and groom (I
wasn’t very popular with wedding photographers). More than once I have stopped
in the middle of ceremony and asked someone to stop taking pictures. On our
Cathedral Quest, I have been asked several times to stop taking pictures.
I also have been known to snap a few –not looking through the viewer
with my camera at my side or inside my jacket. Please don’t report me! Even
that doesn’t help because sometimes the red dot shows on a wall. I have heard
story about people having their cameras confiscated by security and mailed back
to their home.
There are many beautiful and
wonderful church interiors that I, and others, would love to have in their photo
collections. Most of the more famous
churches have lovely books or postcards for sale – another reason they don’t
allow photos. They want to sell
their books. Almost all of these pictures are copyrighted which means that I
cannot copy them to put into this web page. I
do respect the copyright law and hope those who visit my site will also respect
this protection. We have found several churches that didn’t have a book or
post cards to sell and would not allow photography. What a disappointment!!! I
may even tell you later which ones.
There are churches that allow interior photography but no flash. Most
of the time stepping into a huge cathedral and taking a flash picture is a waste
of batteries and card space. I would
tell people snapping a flash picture the minute they walked into the Washington
Cathedral that most flashes wouldn’t carry for a tenth of mile. Generally,
not using a flash does not present a problem with cameras with adjustable ISO
settings. I can adjust my ISO to
1600. Sometimes there is no objection to using a tripod, but I have been told
several times to put it away. In
2005 I bought a compact tripod for our trip to Paris.
The first day I pulled it out to use it, I realized that the bracket that
attaches the camera to the tripod was at home on my dresser.
I brought all that way for nothing. So pushing up the ISO, and manually
lowering the shutter speed and increasing aperture will produced satisfactory
photos. Shutter speeds less than 50
to 35 of a second may blur your picture if you don’t have a steady hand.
If you can’t use a tripod, I would suggest that you place your camera
on the top of a railing, back of a pew or chair and set the automatic timer.
That way you don’t accidently move the camera as you press the shutter.
·
Stained Glass
Stained glass windows are my favorite part of church interiors.
I never got tired of looking at them at the Washington Cathedral. I have
photographed all
of them which I have in an album. It was breath taking to see
how the reflections of the stained glass on the walls changed from hour to hour
as the location of the sun changes. Taking pictures of stained class is a little
tricky. I can’t believe the number
of people I see that take “flash” pictures of stained glass windows. This,
of course, usually blocks any light coming through the windows. The whole
purpose of stained glass is to let the light shine through them. Light is very
important to the beauty of any church. It
also has a profound theological and spiritual significance. “And God said, Let
there be light; and there was light. And God saw that light, that it was
good.” We are also called to let
God’s light shine through us.
If you have not had experience in photographing stained glass windows,
may I suggest that you to a local church that has stained glass and
practice. It will give you and better understanding before your cathedral
quests.
When taking photos of interiors, it is sometimes difficult to have enough
light to capture the interior plus to be able to see the colors in the stained
glass. I generally just take the
windows and increase either the shutter speed or raise the aperture setting in
the manual mode. One of the advantages of a digital camera is to be able to
immediately look at the picture and if it is not to your liking then you can
take it over. I would also suggest a
camera with a good zoom lens. Many
cathedral windows are in the clerestory (the top section) and are hard to
photograph without a zoom lens. I
would strongly urge that you to carry a small note pad and write down the photo
number and the subject. Most cathedral guide books identify the various stained
glass windows. My favorite
stained glass windows are in Sante Chapelle in Paris.
I didn’t take enough pictures the first time we were in Paris, so on
the second visit I photographed every window.
I used my tripod until some nice lady told me to put it away!
·
Exterior photos
A second problem concerns exterior photos. I have found that many old
cathedrals have been surrounded by other buildings as time moves on.
Cathedrals like the Washington Cathedral, or Notre Dame Paris, Reims as
an example are in a location by themselves and are easy to photographic.
There are others like Cologne, Freiburg, Rouen where it is impossible,
with most cameras, to get the full view. There are too many close buildings and
by the time you can get the height the sides are blocked.
My camera can take panoramic shots, so sometimes I take the full lower
half and then the top and “stitch” them together when I print them. Often
they look a little distorted but one can get the idea of what it is supposed to
look like. Some wide angle lens give
a “fish bowl” effect. There are
some amazing photos of churches in books where the photographer was either in a
helicopter or hanging off the top of a nearby building.
These, too, are generally copyrighted.
Another
problem I have encountered photographing the exterior of churches and sometimes
the interior is restoration. This is both good and bad. It is good
in that these historic structures are being preserved through the donations of governments,
foundations, church funds, and private individuals. Almost every church
that we have visited has had some type of restoration in progress with much scaffolding
in place. The disadvantage is that for the present, you cannot capture the
full magnificence of the building in your photographs. The good news is
that someday you can return and see the completed restoration. For example
when we visited Milan in 2004, the entire front was covered with scaffolding and
a protective cloth. When we returned to Italy in 2008, we inquired about
Milan Cathedral and found it was still covered so we didn't go back to Milan.
The good news is that in December 2008 it was fully restored to its original splendor.
It would be worth a trip just to Milan to see it.
·
Books and drawings
So my advice is to buy the book of the cathedral or church that you
visiting. You will wish you had when
you get home and try to recall the interior of certain churches.
I always buy one anyway. I
forget that I have to pack them for the return trip home.
Another thing that we have found fun to do on our travels is buy pen and ink
drawing and etchings of churches or other interesting
buildings. We have them framed and all
over our house.
We are probably the only people in the world that have a large poster size
picture of Mont St. Michel over our bed. It
is a wonderful picture with sheep in the foreground, so if I can’t sleep I can
look above the bed and count the sheep….there are 42 of them.
·
IMPORTANT – KEEP A JOURNAL
One piece of advice I would like impress up you is to WRITE, WRITE,
WRITE!!!! Keep a journal. Your mind
does not retain all of the beauty and wonder of the great cathedrals as much as
you think it can. Take a medium size
journal with you and EVERY NIGHT before you say your prayers; write your
impression of all that you saw that day. Even
mention the restaurants where you ate and what you ate.
It is even better when your traveling companion contribute their
thoughts.
Of equal importance is to record the photos that you took in the same
journal. When you return home with
three thousand digital photos and try to remember which church was which you
will regret you didn’t keep a record.
BE SURE THAT YOU SET YOUR CAMERA’S TIME AND DATE FOR THE COUNTRY YOU
ARE VISITING. It unsettling to be at
home and see pictures that indicate that you took them at 3:00 am.
Almost all digital cameras can display the number, time and date of the
picture along with other information about the settings.
Be sure to write down the long number such as 100-3459 as these
numbers are permanent. The other
numbers change as you eliminate pictures.
List the numbers and record subject. It may take a little time, but I
guarantee that you will never regret it. Then
you can say your prayers of thanksgiving for all the wonders that you enjoyed
that day.
·
Place your pictures in albums not in boxes or drawers
When I get home, the first thing that I do is look at my photos on the
computer. Another advantage of a digital camera is that as you view the image on
the computer. If you forget what the picture is, you can right click on the
property tab and see all the information about the picture – time, date,
settings, etc. I use Picasa 3 for my
viewing and printing. I also have
Adobe Photoshop which I sometimes use but I find that program confusing. Some
people I know take the card to a commercial establishment and have everything
printed. I prefer to print my own.
I can crop or make make any adjustments that I want and print only the
pictures that I want. For many years
I used an HP ink jet printer that made use of photo color cartridge.
When it died last year, I bought a HP Laser printer which does incredible
color.
I print four photos on an 8x10, lay the sheets around on tables to dry
thoroughly and then cut them and put them albums as soon as they are dry.
I print my labels on whole sheet label paper and cut them and stick them
under the photo. I have it all finished in less
than a week. I know a lot of people who can’t believe I do all of
this. They have boxes of
unidentified pictures. Another
thing that I have done is to make an 8x10 of all 133 churches and place them all
in the same album. On the opposite
page of each photo is a brief history of that church.
So I am compulsive…what else is new??
I have great fun thinking about my years of interest in photography and
especially how much it has changed since I started taking pictures about 50
years ago. I hope that you have
enjoyed my memoirs as much as I have telling about them.
Have a good time and take picture and pictures and pictures but remember to
write and write and write in your journal.